Why Do We Still Think Like Cavemen? Zero-Sum Thinking

Ever had that feeling when someone else wins, and it feels like you’ve lost something? That’s zero-sum thinking. It’s the belief that life is a game where if someone else scores, you automatically lose points. But where does this mindset come from, and why do we still cling to it? Buckle up as we dive into our prehistoric roots. 

What the Heck is Zero-Sum Thinking?

Zero-sum thinking is the idea that there’s a fixed pie of resources. If someone takes a bigger slice, there’s less for everyone else. Imagine you’re at a party with one pizza. If your friend grabs half of it, you’re left scrounging for crumbs. In the zero-sum world, the pie never gets bigger, only smaller with every bite someone else takes.

Cavemen and Their Rock Collections

Let’s rewind a few thousand years to when our ancestors were more concerned with not being eaten by saber-toothed tigers than their social media followers. In the caveman days, resources were limited, and survival meant fighting over the last mammoth steak or the best cave. If Grok took the last hunk of meat, you were out of luck and dinner.

This survival game made zero-sum thinking a handy tool. Competition was fierce, and those who won the battle for resources got to pass on their genes. If you were good at hogging the last bit of food, your kids would probably be good at it too. And so, the zero-sum mindset was born and passed down through generations.

Ancient Economies: The Land Grab Bonanza

Fast forward to ancient civilizations, where owning land was the ultimate status symbol. The more land you had, the more power and wealth you wielded. 

Wars and conquests over land reinforced the idea that wealth and resources were zero-sum. Your win was my loss. This wasn’t just a casual game of Monopoly; it was life or death. From the Romans to the Mayans, everyone was playing the same brutal game.

The Fixed Pie Fallacy: When Our Brains Play Tricks on Us

Now, why do we still fall for zero-sum thinking today? We can blame it on a cognitive bias known as the “fixed pie fallacy.” Our brains are wired to see resources as limited, leading us to believe that any gain by someone else is a loss for us. 

When we see resources as limited, we’re more likely to fight over them, even when cooperation could create more for everyone. 

Culture also plays a big role in keeping zero-sum thinking alive. From ancient myths to blockbuster movies, stories often feature heroes who must defeat villains to win. Success is framed as a battle where someone has to lose. Think of every superhero movie ever—if the hero wins, the villain must bite the dust.

Competitive sports are another culprit. We cheer for winners and commiserate with losers. This winner-takes-all mentality seeps into other areas of life, from business to personal relationships. Many grow up believing that to succeed, someone else must be defeated. 

Zero-Sum Thinking in the Modern World: Recipe for Disaster

Today zero-sum thinking plays into politics, fuels nationalism, and fuels protectionism. Countries adopt “me first” policies, believing that helping others means hurting themselves. This mindset leads to trade wars, immigration crackdowns, and global tensions. 

In the business world, zero-sum thinking leads to cutthroat competition. Companies might engage in shady practices to outperform rivals, often ignoring the long-term consequences. This can stifle innovation and damage reputations. 

On a personal level, zero-sum thinking can hurt relationships. Viewing resources like time and attention as limited can create conflicts in families and friendships. Instead of supporting each other, people compete for love, validation, and success. 

Zero-sum thinking has deep historical, psychological, and cultural roots, but it’s time to move beyond it. By understanding its origins and recognizing its limitations, we can embrace new ways of thinking.

The Positive Sum Society is a movement. Click here if you’d like to read more.